Deconstructing the CCPLet the world understand the CCP. The CCP does not represent the Chinese people.

Case File

The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions

An evidence-graded reconstruction of institutions, procedure, disputes, and consequences in The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions.

Human Rights, Ethnicity, Religion, and RepressionState Institutions, Law, and Policy ExecutionLegal instrumentalizationVisibility controlRelational pressureClosed Trials and Heavy Sentences of Xu Zhiyong and Ding JiaxiExtralegal Control and Group-Based Repression
Key eventsFull case chronology and key recordsExpand

  1. A nationwide operation followed the Xiamen gathering

    Xu Zhiyong, Ding Jiaxi, and other citizens were detained, disappeared, or placed in RSDL after a private gathering and related activity.

  2. The cases proceeded as subversion prosecutions

    Both men were arrested and prosecuted, while access to lawyers, family contact, and torture allegations drew continuing UN concern.

  3. A Linyi court held closed trials

    The proceedings were closed to the public, families and supporters could not attend, and judgments were withheld for months.

  4. Xu and Ding received heavy sentences

    Xu received fourteen years and Ding twelve; authorities treated the activity as subversion while external bodies challenged the restrictions on association, expression, and fair trial.

Contents

Visual Guide

Control chain: The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions

Stage 1Identification and classification
→
Stage 2Procedure or administrative measure
→
Stage 3Relational and information pressure
→
Stage 4Trial, release, or continuing control

Background and trigger

The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions concerns a sequence of institutional actions and consequences, not only the final decision visible to the public. The first documented stage was Xu Zhiyong, Ding Jiaxi, and other citizens were detained, disappeared, or placed in RSDL after a private gathering and related activity. It was followed by Both men were arrested and prosecuted, while access to lawyers, family contact, and torture allegations drew continuing UN concern.

What happened

  • 2019-12: A nationwide operation followed the Xiamen gathering: For The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions, Xu Zhiyong, Ding Jiaxi, and other citizens were detained, disappeared, or placed in RSDL after a private gathering and related activity.
  • 2020/2021: The cases proceeded as subversion prosecutions: Both men were arrested and prosecuted, while access to lawyers, family contact, and torture allegations drew continuing UN concern.
  • 2022-06: A Linyi court held closed trials: The proceedings were closed to the public, families and supporters could not attend, and judgments were withheld for months.
  • 2023-04: Xu and Ding received heavy sentences: Xu received fourteen years and Ding twelve; authorities treated the activity as subversion while external bodies challenged the restrictions on association, expression, and fair trial.

Institutions and actions

In The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions, Political-legal system, Courts and procuratorates appear at different stages. Their actions connect through Legal instrumentalization, Visibility control, Relational pressure. Some set the political or administrative line, others convert it into rules and tasks, and the immediate decision is carried out by bodies with control over enforcement, adjudication, information, or resources.

Official position and handling

For The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions, Chinese laws, white papers, or case replies are included where available. When no direct response was found, the file records only the applicable general government position.

Consequences

The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions did not end with the first visible action. Xu received fourteen years and Ding twelve; authorities treated the activity as subversion while external bodies challenged the restrictions on association, expression, and fair trial.

What the evidence establishes

UN special procedures have repeatedly raised concerns about incommunicado detention, counsel access, and torture risks under RSDL. UN experts have described the 2015 709 crackdown as continuing systematic repression of human-rights lawyers and defenders. The public record for The Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxi Case: From Private Gathering to Subversion Convictions includes NPC Standing Committee Decision Amending the Criminal Procedure Law; SPP Rules on Oversight of Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location; Five-Agency Rules on Strict Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence. These materials do not necessarily disclose internal orders, the full affected population, or every local implementation decision. [1] [2] [3]

Key evidence

What the available sources establish

Sources

  1. NPC Standing Committee Decision Amending the Criminal Procedure Lawprimary-recordLive
  2. SPP Rules on Oversight of Residential Surveillance at a Designated Locationprimary-recordLive
  3. Five-Agency Rules on Strict Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidenceprimary-recordLive
  4. Implementation Measures for the Detention Center Regulationsprimary-recordLive
  5. MPS and Ministry of Justice Notice on Lawyer Meetings in Detention Centersprimary-recordLive
  6. Mental Health Law of the PRCprimary-recordUnavailable
  7. Exit and Entry Administration Law of the PRCprimary-recordLive
  8. Prison Law of the PRCprimary-recordLive
  9. NPC Standing Committee Decision Amending the Supervision Lawprimary-recordLive
  10. UN Mandates Communication on RSDLgovernment-reportLive
  11. UN Expert Statement on Chang Weiping and the Crackdown on Lawyersgovernment-reportLive
  12. UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Findings after China Visitgovernment-reportLive
  13. CECC Report on China's Criminal Justice Systemgovernment-reportLive
  14. UN Experts Renew Call for Accountability for Cao Shunli's Deathgovernment-reportLive
  15. 2024 U.S. State Department Human Rights Report on Chinagovernment-reportLive
  16. CECC 2025 Annual Reportgovernment-reportLive
  17. Reporting on the 709 Crackdown on Human Rights Lawyersinvestigative-reportingLive
  18. Human Rights Watch Investigation of China's Black Jailsinvestigative-reportingLive
  19. UN Working Group Communication on Xu Zhiyong and Ding Jiaxigovernment-reportLive
  20. Regulations on Religious Affairsprimary-recordLive
  21. Ministry of Justice Explanation of the Religious Affairs Regulationprimary-recordLive
  22. Population and Family Planning Law of the PRCprimary-recordLive
  23. White Paper on Vocational Education and Training in Xinjiangprimary-recordUnavailable

Related Reading

CaseThe Cao Shunli Case: Custodial Health Care, International Advocacy, and Death InvestigationCaseThe 709 Crackdown: How Legal Advocacy Became a Security RiskCaseThe Chang Weiping Case: RSDL, Torture Allegations, and Pressure on LawyersCasePetitioner Black Jails: Temporary Sites, Security Agents, and Forced Return